Analyzing the Sandoval-Robinson Domestic Violence Restraining Order Case: Insights from Family Law Specialist Rachael Bennett

Read Analyzing the Sandoval-Robinson Domestic Violence Restraining Order Case: Insights from Family Law Specialist Rachael Bennett on RadioNOVO

Analyzing the Sandoval-Robinson Domestic Violence Restraining Order Case: Insights from Family Law Specialist Rachael Bennett

This week on Legally Us, Rachael Bennett, a certified family law specialist and senior attorney at Sullivan Law & Associates, analyzes the situation involving Tom Sandoval's request for a domestic violence restraining order against Victoria and her father, J. Will Robinson.

Sandoval, 44, filed for the restraining order on June 24, alleging verbal and physical abuse by Victoria and her father during a confrontation on June 3. In a detailed court declaration, Sandoval claimed that Will assaulted him and Victoria struck him in the face during a dispute over recording without permission. A video later surfaced showing Sandoval shoving Will into a fire pit before retreating into the home.

On June 27, Will filed his own request for a restraining order against Sandoval, citing injuries sustained during the altercation. The court initially denied Will's request, stating the need for more information at a properly noticed hearing to make a final decision.

Bennett emphasizes the importance of determining the dominant aggressor in such situations, with the video evidence playing a crucial role. However, she notes that the video may not capture the entire confrontation, and the court will consider the events before and after the recording.

According to court documents, Sandoval described the events of June 3, including Will's threatening behavior and Victoria's arrest. Sandoval admitted to helping bail Victoria out of jail but expressed regret over his decision in hindsight. He also accused the Robinsons of ongoing abuse, including tampering with his devices and placing a GPS tracker on his car.

Bennett explains that temporary restraining orders are issued quickly with limited information and time. A judge may deny an emergency order initially but can later grant a restraining order after hearing all the evidence. The outcome of the case is not determined solely by the temporary order.

In conclusion, the situation involving the restraining orders between Sandoval and the Robinsons highlights the complexities of domestic violence cases and the importance of thorough evidence presentation in court proceedings. The court will carefully consider all aspects of the case before making a final decision on the restraining orders.