The FBI's Oxferd Comma Investigation: Questionable Grounds and Political Motives
The FBI initiated a sub-investigation called "Oxferd Comma" following the firing of James Comey by President Trump in May 2017. Despite lacking evidence of collusion between Trump and Russia, the FBI pursued this investigation, which was absorbed into the Mueller probe. Special Agent William Barnett had previously stated that there was no evidence of collusion involving Trump or his associates. The White House released a document on May 16, 2017, outlining the basis for investigating Trump's alleged ties to Russia and potential obstruction of justice.
The FBI's document raised concerns about Trump's interactions with Comey and his statements regarding the Russia investigation. It also highlighted changes made to the Republican Party platform regarding support for Ukraine, suggesting that these actions were favorable to Russia. The document implied that Trump's decision to fire Comey was influenced by the FBI's counterintelligence investigation, rather than a response to a fabricated narrative about collusion with Russia.
Despite evidence suggesting otherwise, the FBI proceeded with the Oxferd Comma investigation, casting doubt on Trump's motives for firing Comey. The investigation was based on unsubstantiated claims and insinuations, further fueling the Russia collusion narrative. The FBI's actions raise questions about the agency's impartiality and adherence to factual evidence.
In conclusion, the FBI's decision to open the Oxferd Comma investigation following Comey's dismissal by Trump was based on questionable grounds and lacked substantial evidence of collusion. The agency's actions highlight the political nature of the Russia collusion narrative and raise concerns about the integrity of the investigative process.